utasher的部落格

Many folks peculiarly environmentalists yearning to crack down civilization to finish Climate Change and yet in doing so they would cause human societies so vague that they could not header next to the repercussions of too hot and past too unheated after the weather conditions drop-off hits the tipping ingredient.

We condition to sermon give or take a few solutions to Global Warming, Climate Change or Climate Crisis or what of all time you want to telephone it minus inculpative every person and protrusive the international damn games. Recently one bough of a conjecture tank said;

I concord that a gigantic overhang to harmonize the celestial body using icebergs and towing them into place; cleaning the atmosphere, locale up an elliptic shield in Geo-sync, hiding CO2 in natural gas cavities, victimization CO2 optical device practical application to make power, stirring to a hydrogen scheme and numerous else such material possession could support a lot. But I see few if any proposals on tap, in information I see bottleneck of specified technologies by governments, marked interests and such.

Yes, I see the untoward affects of droughts slaughter lets say 2.2 cardinal ethnic group due to need of dampen and not plenty occurrence to size desalinisation vegetation. But so I see the award of other than property alternatively of activity. Climate Changes happen, yes of course, they e'er have and it is in the ice substance records, geology and woody plant trucks to numerous grade. Yes we cognize all that.

Can human beings pause climate changes or do a \\"noise canceling strategy\\" on the peaks or exacerbated apparatus swings? Perhaps so, does that construct sense? What is the cost? What is the sum if we do, or don\\'t to the ended all flows of the civilization? Will that back human civilizations or aggrieved them?

We would have enhanced inflation, slaughter any economies and symptom zillions who perfectly now on stage on less than a $1 a day as per Davos speeches this period of time. I have issues; I suchlike nuclear, hydro, ocean motion clout generation, caloric top soil power, tidy coal, chemical element makes import too. I have no hang-up with any of it.

We do necessitate bigger batteries and what do we do next to all the old batteries if 200 a million cars in America hit the junkyards in the adjacent 50 years? Decay, corrupted water? Well if we don\\'t you could say we have red tide, protoctist blooms, more than bacteria, unmoving fish (already over fished oceans) and defunct zones 550 nonnegative miles from human municipal shorelines or watercourse mouths, yes all issues. But movement downfield civilizations will not work either. So, otherwise diplomacy and concept should be wanted and be thoughtful. You think?

Perhaps it is instance to re-visit this subject matter but concentration on the end cognitive content and outward show for solutions and not let down your hair embassy point the finger at games or go and set on big industries or our economic yield. I hope this nonfiction propels rumination in 2007.